Choosing a New Partner at Your VC Firm? Factor in the EQ

shaking hands

After twenty-three years of investing in a hundred VC funds and mentoring a good number of professionals who transitioned from principals to partners, I have seen many successful incorporations of new blood into the partnerships. Also, many who failed to stand the test of time.

I have witnessed quite a few very successful funds, some in which I was an investor, where the partners decided to split ways with no explanation other than partners wanting to go their own ways or stating they couldn’t agree on their next step in growing the firm. On other occasions, a new partner confided the disillusionment she/he had after joining the firm and realizing that, in fact, it wasn’t a partnership of equals and that there were a lot of nuances in the relationships among the other partners. 

That grew my conviction that choosing new partners for a VC firm is an important decision that can impact your company for years to come. It takes more than several conversations and testing analytical and business skills.  A deeper and smarter due diligence to gauge the potential partner’s emotional skills is in order.

So, here are my thoughts on choosing a new partner. 

First, it’s all about timing. There is no specific timing to add partners to a VC firm. Some of the most common reasons to look for a partner are:

i) growth of the management firm: many VC funds start only with two co-founders, and as the management firm keeps growing the number of funds under administration, the partners may be looking for new people to cover different regions where they are investing; 

ii) depth and variety of skills in the partnership: the co-founders see the need to add new partners with a different set of skills to show the growth of the firm; 

iii) understanding diversification as a path to profitability: the original partners may want to make the firm more diversified to ensure better returns and to steer away from having a too homogeneous set of partners; 

iv) talent retention: the partners may want to promote those in the firm that have shown the skills needed to become a partner, securing in this way that the best talents are kept in the firm; or 

v) succession plan: some partners may want to begin to slow down from day-to-day involvement, or they are looking for the next generation of leaders for when the moment to step down arrives.

The best partnerships have some key elements:

The path to partnership is not a straight line in which you go from one position in the firm to the next, and then … you become a partner. To become one, you have to demonstrate that you have added value to the firm and that you live by the mission and values of the firm. I’ve known excellent investment professionals who were doing great deals, and yet failed to have the skills of a leader, and they never made it as partners.

So, when choosing a new partner, I would recommend developing a set of KPIs before the new partner is minted. And front and center is the Emotional Quotient (EQ), that is, emotional intelligence skills.

It’s important to understand that emotional skills (EQ) are as relevant -or more- than IQ ones when choosing your next partner. There are a lot of people with excellent financial skills and industry knowledge who lack the minimum abilities to become a leader and build a firm. 

 A few recommendations on how to test if your candidate is “partner-ready”: 

What does it take to be emotionally intelligent?

Armed with these insights, now is the time to assess who can be your next partner.

Exit mobile version